Creative Commons license icon

Jungle Book II, Dumbo II

No votes yet

Money is money. References are made to further sequels to Disney classics in the works in this article from Yahoo, which also covers the mouse's other recent animated forays:

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=493&u=/ap/20020213/ap_en_mo/wkd_disney_sequels_2

Comments

Your rating: None

NNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Your rating: None

I second the motion. Just say NO! to sequels, kits.

Smile! The world could use another happy person.

Your rating: None

And, as far as other studios, there's Balto II, which is on TV, um.. now, and apparently gonna be on video in a few days. Interesting marketting descision. I haven't seen it yet, and I'm not expecting much, though if nothing else, we seem to be getting a DVD of the original Balto out of the whole deal. :o,

And, who knows. It being an original story, essentially, it MIGHT not suck. I mean, Lion King II wasn't all bad, was it..? :oP

In general, I think sequels like this can be marginally okay if the first movie was pretty much original, but doing it to something like Cinderlla, or even Jungle Book, seems just plain wrong.

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <b> <i> <s> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <sub> <sup> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <dl> <dt> <dd> <param> <center> <strong> <q> <cite> <code> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This test is to prevent automated spam submissions.