Review: 'Nordguard: Across Thin Ice', by Tess Garman & Teagan Gavet
Nordguard, Book One: Across Thin Ice
by Tess Garman & Teagan Gavet
St. Paul, MN, Sofawolf Press, June 2011
Hardcover $39.95 (75 pages), paperback $19.95
Tess Garman (Kenket) & Teagan Gavet (BlackTeagan) – better known under their joint pseudonym of Blotch – have a well-deserved reputation for anthropomorphic light humor, with numerous cover paintings and their webcomic-turned-graphic novel Dog’s Days of Summer.
Now the duo show that they are equally adept at drama, with the beginning of a cold, cruel tale of murder and treachery in an anthropomorphic Far North.
Furry fans should definitely not miss “Nordguard: Across Thin Ice” [WikiFur].
In November 1903, in the Northern Territory of the United Territories [roughly Canada’s Northwest Territories], an emergency message is telegraphed from the isolated Tartok mine: “Many dead, more dying.” Freezing winter storms have cut the mine off from the nearest sea ports, so the only chance of getting immediate aid to Tartok is by an overland sled team of the Nordguard, the major civilian rescue/mail delivery/trailblazing organization of that territory.
The team selected for the mission is Pi’s, an elite group of Husky and Malamute sled dogs with an admirable record of success. But this mission from “the corps” (a vaguely hinted-at governmental body) to the Nordguard comes with ominous undertones, from a new inexperienced field surgeon assigned to Pi’s team to an arrogant Russian major whom they are required to take along for political reasons.
“Book One: Across Thin Ice”, is the adventure of Pi’s team crossing the deadly but beautiful White Land, in early winter when the ground is not yet quite safely frozen, to reach the Tartok mine. There are menaces from both the harsh landscape and the hunters of the Maguruq, tribes of native “strays”. The reader already knows from a prologue that what they will find at Tartok will intensify the mystery and danger immensely, but that is for Book Two.
The publisher’s notes for “Nordguard” say that:
Painstakingly hand-painted in watercolors over the span of several years, there is both amazing detail and broad vibrant landscapes, in colors that run from blinding snowfields through golden firelight and the spectral green of the Aurora Borealis.
The book features Blotch’s characteristic detailed, well-researched landscapes, here of the wild frozen country and settlements of the early 20th century Yukon gold rush – dominated by earthy browns and icy blues – and an equally detailed anthropomorphic cast. The main characters are Pi’s team of sled dogs, but with a rich background of other Northern animals: bears, hares, mustelids, lynx, caribou, and some Asiatic animals to personify the foreigners.
The team is sharply detailed, headed by Pi, a charismatic Husky bitch, a decisive leader; London, her point dog and lover; Nickel, the happy-go-lucky risk-taker of the team; Geri & Freki, the twin wheel dogs; and Lt. James Mckay, the insecure medic newbie on the team (not a Husky nor Malamute) who is anxious to prove himself. Their trek gives them many opportunities to show their mettle, but the ongoing presence of the troublemaking Major Kutukov and the distant appearance of Maguruq warriors promise that they are only entering the realm of greatest danger.
This is a very satisfactory first installment of a tense thriller which is bound to enhance Garman’s & Gavet’s already-stellar reputation.
Read more: Flayrah's interview with Blotch on Nordguard
About the authorFred Patten — read stories — contact (login required)
a retired former librarian from North Hollywood, California, interested in general anthropomorphics
I see IGN has a review up as well, albeit somewhat grudgingly. Could this so-called "furry lit" actually be having an impact?
(It certainly has a better chance if we see more work of this calibre.)
IGN is reviewing books now? Have Video games really gotten that bad? Lol.
If by "furry lit" you mean books, adult or juvenile, that mature furry fans would enjoy reading, I've been reviewing them since the 1960s, and I can say that probably a thousand in my opinion fall into that category. I compiled three editions of "An Anthropomorphic Bibliography" for Yarf! in the 1990s, and the last of those, in January 2000, listed well over 500 titles. And there has been a lot of furry lit published since then.
I agree, but the IGN reviewer who I got the quote from appears to have seen it as a recent phenomenon. I'm curious as to whether the genre is finally gaining legitimacy under its own name, either because more such material is being published, or the quality is improving. (Of course, it may just be because IGN's reviewers are drawn from the crowd.)
The reviewer is speaking of "furry lit" in terms of a comic/graphic novel genre, though, which doesn't give a lot of hope to those of us trying to gain recognition for furry literature that isn't so heavily art-based.
The IGN reviewer in question knows furry stuff pretty well, but he also knows his IGN audience, which is pretty likely to consider "furry" as snicker-worthy if they consider it at all. I don't think the review was grudging -- it was quite positive, after all -- it was simply written in a way which started out with, in effect, "set aside your biases, because there's some good stuff out there that's pretty furry."
You should have written about 2 times less, mostly explaining the plot. Someone unfamiliar with the artist (ex: me) wouldn't care for anything, except a short plot summary. THEN, if the reader is interested, he/she might read all the details after.
I'm confused . . . why is providing more information a bad thing? If a person is unfamiliar with the artists, wouldn't they be as likely to want to know more about the plot (so they'd know if they would be interested in the story), not less?
I could understand if there were a lot of waffling, but the whole review fits on a single page. I'm not sure you could have less and consider it more than a "buy/don't buy" – and you get that in the teaser. Is it hard to skip a paragraph or two? (If it is, I could look into adding headers for the next review.)
Post new comment