Creative Commons license icon

French fursuiters lose Disneyland Halloween trip over heads

Edited as of 03:54
Your rating: None Average: 4.4 (5 votes)

Disneyland Paris Halloween 2011 fursuiter tripAn annual trip to Disneyland Paris for fursuiters and friends will not occur in 2012, says event organizer Timduru.

While the park's Halloween rules allow costumes, this year saw the addition of a clause noting that officials might reject:

[...] the wearing of certain costumes, such as those fully covering the face and the head (translation)

Fursuiters have taken trips to Disneyland since at least 2003; the event attracted 60 fans in 2011.

The status of amateur costuming in Disney theme parks around the world is mixed. Florida's Disney World has been known to turn a blind eye; California's Disneyland does not.

Despite the setback, French fursuiters can still attend several events, including Timduru's own Meerkat Manor dances (video - more).


Your rating: None Average: 3 (3 votes)

I wonder if the Aurora Colorado shooting has factored into Disney not allowing full prop costumes, or at least ones covering their head as many theaters have done. Granted their two different venues, but it might be in their interest to "protect" those that go into their parks.

Your rating: None Average: 4.8 (4 votes)

It probably is a safety concern, but I doubt the French would do it based on an event half the globe away.

Your rating: None Average: 3 (2 votes)

I dunno. I heard someone saying they increased security even at some cinemas over here, and other countries too, in case there were copycat shootings. It makes no sense of course as it was one deranged individual but people are hardly rational creatures. But to my knowledge is done for safety reasons. There are many places where it is illegal to cover your face in public because it prevents identification, something that would be very east for a criminal to abuse.

"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind."
~John Stuart Mill~

Your rating: None Average: 4.7 (3 votes)

They probably had this new policy because Non-Disney animal characters would get more attention than Disney characters. If I was at Disneyland and a Fox character who is not Robin Hood was there. I would probably pay more attention to him than Mickey Mouse. They will just have to rather stick with Disney characters.

Your rating: None Average: 5 (2 votes)

This is actually French law that was passed to ban the wearing of religious headgear, hoodies and caps and also tangentially and presumably unintentionally fursuitters.

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <b> <i> <s> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <sub> <sup> <object> <embed> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <dl> <dt> <dd> <param> <center> <strong> <q> <cite> <code> <em>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

This test is to prevent automated spam submissions.
Leave empty.

About the author

GreenReaper (Laurence Parry)read storiescontact (login required)

a developer, editor and Kai Norn from London, United Kingdom, interested in wikis and computers

Small fuzzy creature who likes cheese & carrots. Founder of WikiFur, lead admin of Inkbunny, and Editor-in-Chief of Flayrah.